FIFG champions archive reveals FootGolf’s global elite across major events
The FIFG champions archive is less a trophy shelf than a map of FootGolf power. Across Majors, Masters, World Cups, the European Championship, Sudamericana and the Asia Cup, the same names keep resurfacing, and that recurrence tells you where the sport’s real center of gravity sits.
The archive shows a sport with layers, not random winners
FootGolf’s title history is already deep enough to separate one-off results from sustained command. FIFG’s archive spans the biggest competitive lanes in the sport, which means the winners are being measured across distinct stages, not a single bracket or a single region. That breadth matters because it shows a championship structure with hierarchy: local strength feeds continental events, and continental events feed the global crown.
The archive also makes clear that FootGolf is no longer just collecting champions. It is building a record of the athletes who can survive across formats and geographies, which is exactly what a mature international circuit should produce.
The repeat winners define the modern elite
Three names stand out because they return again and again in different places and different seasons. Ben Clarke appears across Japan, Italy, Mexico, Portugal and the United States. Cédric Bonnot shows up in France, the UK and Japan. Antonio Balestra has wins in the UK, the United States and Argentina.
That pattern is the real story inside the archive. These are not players protected by home conditions or one familiar course setup. They win on different continents, against different fields, which suggests a top tier built on portability, not just local form. In FootGolf, that kind of recurrence is what turns a champion into a cross-era reference point.
The wider archive reinforces that point. Names such as Bela Lengyel, Christian Otero, Matias Perrone, Sophie Brown, Stefano Grigolo, Bence Backskai, Lucia Cermakova and Jan Aksel Odden sit inside the same competitive record, showing that the sport’s elite pool is international rather than concentrated in one national pipeline.
Why the same players keep showing up
FootGolf rewards a blend that is easy to describe and hard to master. The player has to strike a soccer ball cleanly, then manage distance, angles and restraint the way a golfer does. FIFG’s official rules describe the game as moving the ball from the teed zone into the hole in the fewest kicks, on 9- or 18-hole courses, which makes consistency across different layouts a core skill rather than a nice extra.
That is why the archive matters beyond the names themselves. If a player can win in Japan and Italy, or France and Japan, or the UK, the United States and Argentina, that signals more than talent. It signals a competitive identity that travels well, one that rewards players who can adapt to unfamiliar greens, teeing zones and tournament rhythms without losing control of their scoring patterns.
The rulebook and culture help explain the results

FIFG says the sport has operated under its rulebook framework since 2012, and that the rules have been updated over time to improve player experience, professionalism and fairness. The organization also describes FootGolf as a game played with minimal marshal supervision, where player integrity and courtesy carry real weight.
That culture matters when you look at the archive. In a sport that leans on self-policing and shared etiquette, the best players are not only the ones with the sharpest striking touch. They are the ones who can hold their edge without losing discipline, because a championship environment built on trust places a premium on composure as well as technique.
The world tour is now a real competitive ladder
The archive sits inside a larger structure that gives those repeat winners context. FIFG’s World Tour includes both World Ranking and Regional Rankings, and its competition calendar explicitly covers continental tournaments in North America, South America, Europe and Asia-Pacific. That means the title board is not floating in isolation. It is part of a ranking system that tracks performance at multiple levels.
The governing body’s committee structure also shows how much institutional weight now sits behind the sport. FIFG has committees for competitions, the World Cup, rules and women’s FootGolf, which is the kind of internal architecture that usually appears only after a sport has moved well beyond novelty status. The champions archive is one visible output of that machinery.
The World Cup has become the benchmark
FIFG calls the World Cup the pinnacle of FootGolf, and the numbers show why. The 2023 World Cup in the United States drew 972 players from 39 countries, a scale that would have been difficult to imagine when the 2012 World Cup in Hungary featured 79 players from 8 countries. That jump does more than mark growth. It shows a sport that has widened from a small international nucleus into a global event with real depth.
Acapulco 2026 pushes that expansion further. The championship page lists 1,240 participating players and 64 teams, with the Individual World Championship scheduled from May 27 to June 1, 2026, and the Team World Championship from June 2 to June 7, 2026. Those dates matter because they show the event has enough depth to support separate individual and team competitions on the same global stage.
What the dynasty era says about FootGolf now
The strongest reading of the archive is not that a few players have dominated by accident. It is that FootGolf has already produced a generation of athletes who can win across borders, under different formats, and at the sport’s biggest events. Clarke, Bonnot and Balestra are the clearest proof of that, because their wins do not stay in one country or one section of the map.
That is what a true elite tier looks like in a young but organized sport: repeat names, wider geography, bigger fields and an institutional ladder that keeps raising the stakes. The champions archive captures all of it in one place, and the modern dynasty era is already visible in the names that keep coming back.